The 119th issue of Doctor Who Magazine had a cover date of December 1986.
Contents
Articles
- Myths & Legends - Over the years various mythologies have been plundered for inspiration by the production teams on Doctor Who. In Part One of Myths and Legends Richard Marson traces the evolution of the unique 'Whoniverse' during the eras of the first three Doctors.
Comic content
- The History Tour: The Bits We've Missed So Far by Tim Quinn & Dicky Howett
- Changes - Episode 2
Fiction
- Doctor Who Magazine Short Story Competition
- Winner Under 15 Category: Hall of Mirrors by Alan Mckee
Archives
- Nostalgia Feature: TV: The Dæmons (a revisiting of classic stories and favourite moments by Patrick Mulkern)
Interviews / Profiles
- Travelling Companions - Jamie McCrimmon, the young Scottish Highlander who joined the Second Doctor on his travels, was one of the most popular and longest serving companions. By Richard Marson.
- Nicola Bryant Interview - In Issue 111, we asked readers to send us questions they'd like to put to Nicola Bryant. Penny Holme recently put a selection of them to Nicola after she had her final Doctor Who story.
A4 pin-ups
- The newly regenerated Sixth Doctor (from TV: The Twin Dilemma)
Previews
- None
Reviews - Off the Shelf
- Gary Russell's Christmas Gift Review
- NOVELISATION: The Mind Robber by Peter Ling (Target Books)
- GAME: Doctor Who and the Mines of Terror (for Commodore 64)
Also featuring
- To the TARDIS (Letters)
- Doctor Who? by Tim Quinn & Dicky Howett
- Gallifrey Guardian
- Matrix Databank
- Did You Know: Record Runs by Darren Scott (Half page)
Credits
- Editor: Sheila Cranna
- Assistant Editor: Penny Home
- Art Director/Design: Steve Cook
- Production: Alison Gill
- Advertising: Sally Benson
- Publisher: Stan Lee
- Advisor: John Nathan-Turner
Additional details
- This issue was priced 85p (UK) and the main cover photograph was from a promotional shoot for the new series featuring Nicola Bryant as Peri by Steve Cook.
This article needs a big cleanup.
2025 needs to be added
These problems might be so great that the article's factual accuracy has been compromised. Talk about it here or check the revision history or Manual of Style for more information.